P.S. Share this video with your friends and family who could benefit from learning peacemaking skills. We can all create a more peaceful world together!
Summary:
The lesson delves into various peaceful approaches employed by leaders concerned about social justice, following the discussion of Martin Luther King’s Six Principles of Active Nonviolence. It explores the meticulous planning behind nonviolent direct actions, using historical examples like the Montgomery Bus Boycott. The lesson introduces Gene Sharp’s Theory of Power, principles of direct action by Michael Nagler, and approaches from Boyd and Mitchell’s “Beautiful Trouble.” Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” are also discussed, emphasizing the need for constant pressure on opposition and strategic tactics.
Reflection Questions:
- How does the planning and execution of nonviolent direct actions contribute to their success, as illustrated by examples like the Montgomery Bus Boycott?
- In Gene Sharp’s Theory of Power, why is it proposed that rulers derive their power from the consent of their subjects? How does this perspective differ from other theories of power?
- Discuss Michael Nagler’s Six Principles for actively nonviolent individuals. Which principle resonates with you the most, and why?
- How can the pluralistic notion of power, as embraced by Gene Sharp, influence social change efforts? Provide examples of how various centers of power may be challenged.
- Explore the principles from Boyd and Mitchell’s “Beautiful Trouble.” Why is reframing the issue considered essential for peacemakers, and how can it impact public perception?
- Compare the strategies of not dressing like a protestor and killing them with kindness. How do these approaches aim to influence public opinion and attract sympathizers to a cause?
- Reflect on Saul Alinsky’s “Thirteen Rules for Radicals.” How can these rules be reframed into a more peaceful approach, aligning with the principles of Gandhi and Martin Luther King?
- Consider the principle, “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” How might this principle be applied in peacemaking efforts?
- Discuss the importance of having constructive alternatives, as emphasized by Michael Nagler. Why is it crucial for those advocating change to present practical alternatives to the status quo?
- In the context of nonviolent direct action, why is it essential to consider the long-term implications of actions, as highlighted by Nagler? How can actions with potential short-term gains impact long-term goals?